if
One and Aye can never each be zero and together they can never be equal to each other,
then
zeta = one + aye
can never be as simple as zeta (1) = aye (.5) + one (.5)
and
can never be as simple as zeta (1) = aye (1) + one (0) = OR = aye (0) + one (1)
and
then
if
one is dependent on aye and zeta dependent on both
then
for example (the vice versa applies equally - pun intended)
as aye increases and one decreases
then
if
zeta shifts dependency to aye
then
aye depends more on one
and
one disappears (approaches zero)
which
cannot happen
OR
if
zeta shifts dependency to one
then
aye must reverse it dependency
causing
the reverse of the previous if (before the OR - 7 lines up)
which
cannot happen
So I guess this problem either doesn't exist or isn't solvable, but I'd love someone else's opinion besides my own
And if this has any validity, then it also might debunk dualism and all knowledge based on dualism, which is essentially everything.